Being "Social"

I have a Facebook account that I check periodically, so that covers the assignment for this week.
I decided to read and check out some of the articles on social networking on the 23 Things PB wiki too.

First, I read Micheal Stephen's post: "What Librarians Can Learn from Facebook." He made a comment about the types of privacy that people are accepting of versus types that they balk at. Some adults feel uncomfortable with providing the type of information found in a Facebook account. Yet, Stephens points out that many adults are comfortable providing personal financial information when using online shopping sites. It will be interesting to see how long it will take before providing information found on Facebook profiles such as hobbies, interests, and present location become as comfortable to share as financial information such as credit card numbers and billing addresses.

Next, I looked at a few Twitter sites. I’ve known about Twitter since its inception, but have never joined because I don’t have a use for it. The fallout from the Iran election though illustrates a great purpose for Twitter though. Not only is Twitter helpful because its open access can evade the strict Iranian government censors, but also because it provides immediate updates in real time. I also remember reading a year ago about how librarians used Twitter for work purposes. A woman needed help brainstorming programming ideas. She posted a tweet mentioning that she had trouble. Some of her fellow librarian followers replied back by giving her suggestions. Twitter works effectively in situations like the one above only if there are a certain number of loyal followers.


Lastly, I discovered how I benefit from social networking by looking at a combination of sites. I looked at the Carnegie Library profile on Library Thing, The Green Tree Library's Facebook page and the ACLA Twitter page. All of these turned out to be sources of research and learning instead of sources of social contact. I discovered the “11th Stack” blog run by the reference staff at the main CLP branch and perused some of the recent posts. I found a link to Library Journal a list of top public libraries ranked according to service by viewing the Green Tree Library Facebook page. While the page remained open, I scrolled through the list with an interest in the Maryland libraries, since that’s where I grew up and I found out that one of the local libraries made the list too! I was not too impressed with the content on the ACLA’s Twitter page, but I found a link to their main page and read about a successful program that the Shaler library held recently. The link turned out to be a great source for programming ideas. I picked up new pieces of information after looking at those sites. Once I finished looking at the articles on the 23 Things pb wiki page, I realized that I tend to use social networking sites as static sources of information rather than as an interactive forum to connect with other individuals.

Exploring Databases

I wish I had a clever "Star Trek: The Next Generation" reference for my title this week. . .

I guess I'll stick to a plain old analysis (see below).

For once, I read all of the database background materials on the 23 Things wiki. I think the articles helped me understand how people view databases as a search tool and the challenges that librarians face when most people go straight to search engines.

The “23 Things” post instructed us to peruse three databases that are unfamiliar with and write up our reactions. I chose the Auto Repair Reference Center, Reference USA, and The Grove Dictionary of Art. I consider myself familiar the process of conducting a query in databases, so I looked at the aforementioned databases with a different purpose: to explore their library and web 2.0 features. During my search, I also discovered how some of the databases could be useful for certain patrons and their search requests.

First, I looked at the Grove Dictionary of Art. I saw that the creators spent a long period of time perfecting the searching process. There were many filtering/narrowing options and different ways to organize the search results. All of this attention made it easy to find information on any term that I typed into the box. I felt disappointed by the way it presented images though. I thought that I could find a few Web 2.0 features in a database devoted to images. I did not find anything special about the dictionary, though. The only advanced viewing option for images dealt with the ability to enlarge a thumbnail visual. I think that they could add some neat effects such as the ability to view the objects from different angles – if in 3D- or a zoom feature to see a painting up close. I think adding a tagging option would also help. I also felt surprised when I searched for terms such as “silkscreen” and “woodblock” and got a list of artist biographies instead of images. I learned that you have to narrow the search and specify that you want images. Maybe I expected too much out of the online dictionary. . . .

Next, I checked out the Reference USA database. Although I felt disappointed at first to discover that I had to limit my search to US business and residents only, I ended up being pleased with what I found anyway. I had fun by searching for where my mom and my boyfriend work. The amount of detail in the business profile was impressive. I also used the residential features to look up my cousin’s address. During the residential search, I found a mapping option and that presented a mashup map comvining information from Google Maps as well as Reference USA. Do mashups count as a Web 2.0 feature? Anyway, The site claims that market researchers as well as job searchers could use this database. Since we get a fair number of job seekers in the computer center, I can mention this as an additional source of information. I also realzed that I could recommend this site to a certain patron who comes to use our computers mostly to find contact information for small businesses located all around the country, Usually, I recommend the white pages and yellow pages online, but sometimes the information is not there. Hopefully I can remember this database when he comes in next time and we can find out if it has the information that he needs.

Finally, I searched the Auto Repair Reference Center. I was impressed by how easy it was to navigate the website. I noticed though that there were many technical terms that I did not understand and it was difficult to conduct a random search; one needs precise information to use this database. I would hesitate to offer this database as an information source unless the patron knew what he or she needed and if he/she had enough information to search. Surprisingly, after finding most of the results as embedded PDF files, the creators added a Flash media option under the “Auto IQ” tab where one can view and listen to information on specific parts of an automobile: neat! Is the use of Flash considered a part of web/ library 2.0? Other than the discovery of the Flash feature, the database seemed pretty bland.


I spent a few hours exploring and searching three databases for the 23 Things exercise this week. Even though I don’t work with the databases often or deal with people who do, I know their research value. Online databases were a part of my college research experience from 2001-2004. In fact, during my freshman year, I had a few class sessions taught by one of the librarians and they covered how to search the databases including how to find a database tailored to a specific subject, what types of keywords to use, how to narrow your search, and explaining the differences among the various ones. The librarians also discussed the use of databases in conjunction with search engines as research tools. They did not completely outlaw They told me and my classmates Those introductory sessions made a difference in how I went about conducting research for my papers. Thank you liberal arts college!

I mention this memory because I’ve been thinking why it is difficult to draw users to databases as a primary search tool. One of the reasons that they are not used is people do not know that they exist or, if they know that they exist, they may not understanding the purpose of the databases. I wish it were possible to take groups of people and train them how to use our databases like what I experienced in college. My classmates could not use the excuse that they did not know that the databases existed, because all freshmen were subject to the lecture early on in their college careers. I think it would be nice if new patrons to the library could get exposed to the databases in the beginning of their Northland tour, but it will not work in a public library environment, especially one as large as Northland. Presently, I think using the start page of our library webpage to place a bi-weekly profile of a different database could be an advertisement option. The profile could serve as a way to make the databases more accessible by being in a prominent location and the profile could mention the types of searches that one can conduct with them. Hopefully, this can become a realisitic product in the near future.

To Read or To Listen? Downloading Audiobooks and Ebooks

I’m already familiar with how to access and read an eBook through netLibrary, so I decided to challenge myself by downloading an eAudio file from OverDrive. Since I did not want to download software to our staff computer, I went through the process on my home computer.

I’d already spent too much time this week searching for an interesting title across range of all the electronic material types, so I decided to simplify my search this time. I found an eAudio novel by searching for “Canada” as a subject. Next, I clicked on the link that took me from the catalog search results to the Carnegie Library Digital Media Center page where I saw that I could download and check out the materials. I didn’t realize that it would take about four clicks and three different browser windows to both download the Overdrive software as well as download the actual book onto the computer. The “download” buttons on each of the windows were always difficult for me to spot on the page; it took me a minute to find them as opposed to my usual quick scan of the page. Most of the rest of the process went smoothly. I ran into trouble as I tried to download the audio file of The Tsarina’s Daughter: A Novel”. My computer is from 2001 which affected the downloading process. After more than half an hour of watching the computer download the audio book, I gave up and canceled the job.

Next, I decided to try and download an audio book through netLibrary in hopes that I would have more success. Instead of using either the catalog or the netLibrary search box to find a title, I went to the netLibrary page and clicked on the “Audio books” link. Then under the category Browse Audio books by Subject” I clicked on the subject “Arts & Entertainment” because it only displayed two results. In this case, I felt relieved to see so few choices. I just wanted to go through the process from beginning to end without any setbacks! I thought that I signed up for a netLibrary account over a year ago, but I was wrong. Luckily, that sign up process was not difficult. I was also glad to see that the audio book download only took about six minutes- yay. Even though I had very little interest in the book that I downloaded- the unabridged “Treasury of Royal Scandals” by Michael Farquhar- I listened to about ten minutes of the book and it started to pique my interest. I closed out of Windows Media Player and then tried to pick up where I left off about 20 minutes later. It took me a few minutes to find the book under the “Now Playing” tab. In case you couldn’t tell, I don’t download media files to my computer. I’m only familiar with downloading documents.

Overall, I like that I get to experiment with all of the new tools from this endeavor, but at the same time, I am still frustrated that it takes multiple tries and longer than an hour to complete the task.